Guides
Longer pieces on the rules behind the calculators: where the numbers come from, and the situations where they break.
Why these guides and not others
The most-searched topics in this trade — "volumetric weight", "how to calculate CBM" — have been written a thousand times, mostly copied from one another. Adding the thousand-and-first copy helps nobody.
The filter here is different: a mistake that costs money and that almost nobody explains. That a container's door is lower than its interior, so the piece stays on the dock. That a 2,500 daN strap contributes 315, so anyone counting straps off the label is short by a factor of eight. That a lorry legal on gross weight can be illegal on an axle. These are things you find out after they have happened.
Where the numbers come from
Every guide cites its source and prefers the original document to a summary: the text of the directive, the official order, the carrier's own data sheet, the standard itself. Where a figure is trade practice rather than a rule, it says so. And where a formula has been checked against a published worked example, it says that too — because a formula copied off a blog can be wrong for years.
The standards and documents that come up most: Directive 96/53/EC and Spain's Order PJC/780/2025 for weights and dimensions; EN 12195-1:2010 and EN 12195-2 for cargo securing; the NMFTA's Docket 2025-1 for US classification; Hapag-Lloyd and OOCL data sheets for container dimensions; and the integrators' published tariffs for volumetric divisors.
If you find something wrong
Every page carries the date it was last reviewed. If a figure has gone out of date or there is an error, telling us is a favour: it gets corrected and the change gets stated, rather than rewritten in silence.